The judge described Google not only as a monopoly provider for distributing apps to Android users, but also as problematic because Google has generated billions in revenue from it – similar to Apple’s in-app payment platform for the App Store (outside Europe). In addition, it is difficult for developers to refer consumers to alternative payment platforms.

Google’s response was to raise the possibility of Android users installing apps from third-party app stores that contain malware, which would lead to “security chaos.” This is similar to Apple’s reasoning for wanting to keep the “walled garden” for the App Store. Both companies say that without the ability to scan apps in third-party app stores, there is a greater chance of malware being introduced into iPhone and iPad. Android phones.

The judge made it clear that he wants Google to make big changes to the Play Store, even if it costs Google what the Alphabet subsidiary estimates will be $600 million. Donato hopes to release the framework for the changes he wants to make to the Play Store, possibly by Labor Day weekend. Google wants the judge to give the company 12 to 16 months to implement any changes.